CONEXANT SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS CONEXANT SYSTEMS (PB) PVT LTD),HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following a High Court decision, allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal with liberty to restore it if the Vivad Se Viswas scheme outcome is not in their favour.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme and had filed the necessary declarations. The Revenue had no objection to the assessee availing the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH: This appeal filed by the assessee for AY 2006-07 is directed against DCIT – 1(2), Hyderabad’s order dated 31/12/2019 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 144C/254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
:- 2 -: Conexant Systems Pvt. Ltd., Hyd.
At the outset, Ld. AR submitted before us that the assessee desires to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. In this connection, he invited our attention to the letter dated 31/03/2021 addressed to ITAT, Hyderabad wherein it was stated that the assessee has filed a declaration in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 and received Form No. 3, which is enclosed, but, the same is not available on record.
The Ld. DR submitted that if the assessee desires to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, 2020 the Revenue has no objection.
Having heard both the parties, through video conference, we are inclined to treat the instant appeal of the assessee as withdrawn relying on the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of DCIT vs. M/s. Keyaram Hotels P. Ltd in T.C.A. No. 694 of 2019, dated 13/10/2020 wherein it was held as under:- “3. The Learned Counsel for the respondent / assessee, on instructions, submitted that the respondent / assessee intends to avail the benefit of Vivad se Vishwas scheme (VVS Scheme for brevity) and in this regard, the assessee is taking steps to file the application / declaration in form No.1. ……. …….. ……
:- 3 -: Conexant Systems Pvt. Ltd., Hyd.
As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.
In the light of the above, we direct the respondent / assessee to file Form No.1 on or before 09/11/2020 and the competent authority http://www.judis.nic.in5/6 T.C.A.No.694 of 2019.” Accordingly, we hereby dismiss the instant appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee’s case is not accepted in the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be reason on a subsequent date, then the assessee shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petition before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate its appeal. It is ordered accordingly. 5. In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 26th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026