NIRMALA DEVI MUNDHRA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(3), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. It was clarified that the assessees could approach the Tribunal to reinstate the appeals if their Vivad Se Vishwas applications were rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals before the ITAT. They subsequently filed applications under the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020'. The assessees then requested to withdraw their appeals before the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessees should be allowed to withdraw their appeals before the ITAT due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘S M C’ BENCH, HYDERABAD.
Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI
Date of Hearing : 19.04.2021. Date of Pronouncement : 19.04.2021. O R D E R All these appeals are filed by the respective assessees arising out of different orders of the respective Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad for the Assessment Years mentioned herein above respectively. submitted that the assessees do not want to pursue the appeals as they have already filed forms I & II under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ and received Form 3 in all the above appeals except in Form 3 is yet to be issued by the department. Therefore, consequent to the same, the assesses desires to withdraw the appeals before the Tribunal. Hence it was pleaded, that the appeals of the assessees may be treated as withdrawn.
The ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld. AR.
After hearing both the parties, according to the request of the assessees and their Ld. AR, we hereby allow the appeals of the assessees to be withdrawn. We also make it clear that the assessees shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal within the stipulated time as provided under the Act, in order to reinstate the appeals, if their applications with respect to Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme are rejected.
In the result, appeals of assessees are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 19th April, 2021.
Sd/- (Smt. P. Madhavi Devi) Judicial Member Hyderabad, Dt. 19th April, 2021.
* Reddy gp Copy to :
Appellants. Nirmala Devi Mundhra, 15-2-458 to 460, 2nd Floor, Kusum Commercial Complex, Kishangunj, 1. Hyderabad-500 012 Mundhra Jagdish Prasad (HUF), D.No.15-2-458 to 460, 2nd Floor, Kusum Commercial Complex, 2. Kishangunj, Hyderabad-500 012 Chanchal Mundhra, 2nd Floor, Kusum Commercial Complex, Kishangunj, Hyderabad-500 012 3. Jagdish Prasad Mundhra, 15-2-458/460, 2nd Floor, Kusum Commercial Complex, Kishangunj, 4. Hyderabad-500 012 Jagdish Prasad Mundhra, 15-2-458/460, 2nd Floor, Kusum Commercial Complex, Kishangunj, 5. Hyderabad-500 012 Respondents 1 Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(3), Hyderabad. Pr. C I T-3 & 4, Hyderabad. CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad. CIT (Appeals)- 3, Hyderabad. DR. ITAT, Hyderabad. Guard File.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026