NMDC LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal, noting the assessee's intention to avail the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme and the Revenue's no objection. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, the assessee expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal due to opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, dated in F.No. Pr. CIT- 4/263/21/2018-19, dated 28/03/2019 passed U/s. 263 of the Act for the A.Y. 2012-13.
At the outset, Ld. AR submitted before us that the assessee desires to withdraw his appeal as the assessee has opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. It was further submitted that the assessee had filed Form No.1 & 2 and is awaiting to receive Form-3 from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR stated that if the assessee desires to opt Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme, the Department has no objection.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, We are inclined to allow the appeal of the assessee to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the assessee that he has preferred to avail the Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and Form-3 is awaiting to receive from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the assessee. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee’s case is not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate the appeal. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on 19th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Alok Kumar Sethi, Bhubaneswar vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Natuk Mra vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 10 Nov 2026
- Tatvam Procon Private Limited, Gujarat vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 10 Nov 2026
- Swapna Acharya vs. Superintendent, GST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar-1Orissa · 10 Nov 2026
- M/S. Ashok Panda, Dhenkanal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax , CT And GST Circle, DhenkanalOrissa · 10 Nov 2026