BALKRISHNA GOBINDRAM SHROFF,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MUMBAI-8, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested permission to withdraw the appeal due to the non-appealable nature of the PCIT's order. The Tribunal granted the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging an order passed by the PCIT under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later realized that the order under Section 264 is not appealable as per Section 253 of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether an order passed by the PCIT under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act is appealable before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B” BENCH
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI GAGAN GOYALvk-vk-la- 1374@eaqcbZ@2023 ¼fu-oa- 2019&20½
vihykFkhZ }kjk@Appellant by : Shri K. Gopal, Advocate izfroknh }kjk@Respondent by : Shri C. T. Mathews, Sr. AR lquokbZ dh frfFk@Date of hearing : 19/06/2023 ?kks”k.kk dh frfFk@Date of pronouncement : 19/06/2023 vkns’k/ ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-8 (hereinafter referred to as “the PCIT”) dated 28.02.2023 passed u/s 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), for the assessment year 2019-20.
P a g e | (A.Y.2019-20) BALKRISHNA GOBINDRAM SHROFF 2. Shri K. Gopal, Advocate for the assessee/appellant filed an application from the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The relevant extract of the said application is as under:
Sub: Application for Permission to withdraw the above mentioned Appeal The present application is to seek Your Honors' permission to withdraw the above-mentioned appeal which is fixed for hearing on 19.06.2023. The Appellant has inadvertently filed the present appeal challenging the order dated 28.02.2023 passed by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai - 8 under section 264 of the Act. As the said order is not appealable as per section 253 of the Act, the Appellant requests Your Honors to kindly grant permission to withdraw the present appeal and oblige. Thanking You, Yours faithfully, Sd/- Balkrishna Gobindram Shroff Appellant
The ld. Departmental Representative (DR) raised no objection in assessee withdrawing the appeal.
In the light of request made by the assessee/appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on Monday the 19th day of June 2023.
More judgments on Section 264
- Murugaiah Althuri, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2100/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Babu Gundlapalle, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2093/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 787/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 786/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Office…ITA 785/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026