GRINDWELLL NORTAN LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to employee PF contribution disallowance, following the Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The grounds for refund of excess DDT and interest under Section 244A were also dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning disallowance of employee PF contribution, non-granting of DDT credit, and non-granting of refund and interest. The assessee did not press the grounds related to DDT credit.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of employee PF contribution is attracted if not paid within due dates, and whether refund/interest on excess DDT payment is admissible.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
Assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 21.03.2022 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (NFAC), Delhi (in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’) and it relates to Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee is contesting the following issues in this appeal :- a) Disallowance of employees contribution to Provident Fund (ground nos. 1 to 5); b) Non-granting of credit of Dividend Distribution Tax (ground nos. 6 & 7);
Grindwell Norton Limited c) Non-granting of refund on account of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (ground nos. 8 & 9); and, d) Non-granting of interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ground no. 10)
At the time of hearing, assessee did not press ground nos. 6 & 7 relating to claim of credit of Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the assessee. Accordingly, the said grounds are dismissed as not pressed.
As regards disallowance of employees contribution to Provident Fund and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), the contention of the assessee will no longer survive in view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT (Civil Appeal No. 2833/2016) dated 12.10.2022, wherein it has been held that disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act will be attracted if employees contribution is not paid within the due dates prescribed in the respective Acts. Accordingly, we dismiss the grounds raised by the assessee on this issue.
With regard to the claim of refund on account of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax, the Ld. AR submitted that the same is decided against the assessee by the order of Special Bench of Tribunal in the case of DCIT vs Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 6997/Mum/2019) dated 20.04.2023. Accordingly, following the decision rendered by the Special Bench of the Tribunal in the above said case, we dismiss the grounds raised in this issue.
Grindwell Norton Limited 5. The grounds relating to claim of refund under Section 244A of the Act would also fail, since we have dismissed the grounds relating to refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax in the preceding paragraph.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th June, 2023.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026