GRINDWELLL NORTAN LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE, BENGALURU

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1087/MUM/2022Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 June 2023AY 2019-203 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to employee PF contribution disallowance, following the Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The grounds for refund of excess DDT and interest under Section 244A were also dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning disallowance of employee PF contribution, non-granting of DDT credit, and non-granting of refund and interest. The assessee did not press the grounds related to DDT credit.

What were the issues?

Whether disallowance of employee PF contribution is attracted if not paid within due dates, and whether refund/interest on excess DDT payment is admissible.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 36(1)(va),Section 244A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY

For Appellant: Shri Akram Khan
For Respondent: Shri Paresh Deshpande
Hearing: 26/06/2023Pronounced: 26/06/2023

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

Assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 21.03.2022 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (NFAC), Delhi (in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’) and it relates to Assessment Year 2019-20. The assessee is contesting the following issues in this appeal :- a) Disallowance of employees contribution to Provident Fund (ground nos. 1 to 5); b) Non-granting of credit of Dividend Distribution Tax (ground nos. 6 & 7);

Grindwell Norton Limited c) Non-granting of refund on account of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (ground nos. 8 & 9); and, d) Non-granting of interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ground no. 10)

2.

At the time of hearing, assessee did not press ground nos. 6 & 7 relating to claim of credit of Dividend Distribution Tax paid by the assessee. Accordingly, the said grounds are dismissed as not pressed.

3.

As regards disallowance of employees contribution to Provident Fund and ESI under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), the contention of the assessee will no longer survive in view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT (Civil Appeal No. 2833/2016) dated 12.10.2022, wherein it has been held that disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act will be attracted if employees contribution is not paid within the due dates prescribed in the respective Acts. Accordingly, we dismiss the grounds raised by the assessee on this issue.

4.

With regard to the claim of refund on account of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax, the Ld. AR submitted that the same is decided against the assessee by the order of Special Bench of Tribunal in the case of DCIT vs Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 6997/Mum/2019) dated 20.04.2023. Accordingly, following the decision rendered by the Special Bench of the Tribunal in the above said case, we dismiss the grounds raised in this issue.

Grindwell Norton Limited 5. The grounds relating to claim of refund under Section 244A of the Act would also fail, since we have dismissed the grounds relating to refund of excess payment of Dividend Distribution Tax in the preceding paragraph.

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 26th June, 2023.

More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)

All 6,054 judgments and leading authorities on Section 36(1)(va) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →