ADVERTISING AGENCIES ASSOCIATION,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEM), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1090/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 June 2023AY 2022-233 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee had submitted all mandated documents and complied with notices. The CIT(Exemption)'s order did not specify which documents were missing. Therefore, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application citing failure to furnish required documents and non-compliance with notices.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) correctly rejected the registration application without specifying missing documents and after the assessee claimed compliance.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Tiwari
For Respondent: Shri Nimesh Yadav
Hearing: 28.06.2023Pronounced: 30.06.2023

O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal, J M:

This appeal has been filed by the assessee, challenging the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) (‘ld.CIT(E) for short), Mumbai in rejecting the application filed by the assessee for registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s. 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act'), pertaining to the Assessment Year (‘A.Y.’ for short) 2022-23.

2.

The brief facts are that the assessee is a charitable trust and has filed an application in Form No. 10AB for the purpose of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. It is observed that the provisional registration u/s. 12AB of the Act in Form 10AC was granted in the assessee’s case. The ld. CIT(E) has rejected the assessee’s application in Form 10AB for the reason that the assessee has failed to furnish all the relevant documents required as (A.Y.2022-23) Advertising Agencies Association vs.CIT(Exemption) per Rule 17A of the Income Tax Rules. The ld. CIT(E) has also rejected for the reason that the assessee has not made compliance to the notices issued by the ld. CIT(E).

3.

Aggrieved the assessee is in appeal before us, challenging the impugned order of the ld. CIT(E).

4.

The learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR for short) for the assessee contended that the assessee trust has complied with all the notices issued by the ld. CIT(E) and has also furnished all the mandatory documents required for the purpose of registration in its application in Form 10AB for the purpose of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. The ld. AR for the assessee submitted a chart showing the details of the submissions made by the assessee and contended that whatever was applicable to the assessee has been furnished before the ld. CIT(E). The ld. AR for the assessee brought our attention to the mail communication filed in the paper book where the relevant attachment as per the email was not found. The ld. AR prayed that the assessee may be given one more opportunity to appear before the ld. CIT(E) and to furnish all the required documents.

5.

The learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) for the Revenue, on the other hand, had nothing to controvert the same.

6.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is observed that the assessee has submitted all the required documents which are mandated as per the provisions of the Act before the ld. CIT(E) for the purpose of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. It is also evident from the order of the ld. CIT(E) that (A.Y.2022-23) Advertising Agencies Association vs.CIT(Exemption) what documents has not been furnished by the assessee is not specified in the order and we are also of the opinion that the assessee has complied with the notices issued by the ld. CIT(E). We deem it fit to remand this issue to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to consider the application of the assessee afresh in light of the submissions made by the assessee as to adhere to the principles of natural justice.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 30.06.2023.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →