FIRST FRAME ENTERTAINMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(5), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's decision to settle under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee retains the right to revive the appeal if the scheme benefit is denied.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2013-14. The assessee subsequently opted to avail the benefit under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020 and received the relevant forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH: This appeal filed by the assessee for AY 2013-14 is directed against CIT(A) - 6, Hyderabad’s order dated 01/11/2019 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ in :- 2 -: First Frame Entertainments Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. . prescribed Form No.1 & 2 and received Form(s)-3 in tune thereto, which is placed on record and therefore, requested the Bench to permit to withdraw this appeal of the assessee.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and received Form(s)-3 in tune thereto, with a rider that it shall be very much open for the assessee to file for revival of this case, if the settlement benefit under the scheme is denied to it for technical reasons.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 21st April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026