ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT vs. KIRANKUMAR RASILKAL SANGHVI, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which increased the monetary limit for appeals to Rs. 50,00,000/-, is binding on the Revenue. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) which deleted an addition of Rs. 1,31,51,290/-. The tax effect of this appeal was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable in light of the revised monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, despite the appeal having been filed before the circular's issuance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.501 citing267 ITR 272 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
आदेश / O R D E R
PER Dr. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
1. The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Ahmedabad in Appeal No. CIT(A)-4/10376/2017-18, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) dated 29.12.2017.
In this revenue’s appeal in , we noticed that revenue has raised ground in respect of addition deleted by the ld. CIT(A), which relates to income from other sources at Rs.1,31,51,290/- on which total tax comes to Rs.44,70,599/-, which comes in the ambit of tax effect of CBDT Circular vide Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite service of notice of hearing of this appeal.
The CBDT has issued Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, whereby the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before Supreme
Assessment Year: 2015-16 Kirankumar Rasilkal Sanghvi Court have been increased as measure for reducing Litigation. The revised monetary limits laid down in para-2 of this Circular are as follows:
Before Appellate Tribunal Rs.50,00,000/- 2. Before High Court Rs.1,00,00,000/- 3. Before Supreme Court Rs.2,00,00,000/-
In the present case, the tax effect by the revenue is less than Rs.50,00,000/-. Though this appeal had been filed by the revenue on 29/04/2019 and was within the monetary limit in the form of tax effect for filing appeals before Tribunal, in view of the recent Circular of CBDT, even such appeals will be governed by the new monetary limits laid down in the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 referred to above.
It is a settled law that the Circulars issued by CBDT are binding on the Revenue. This position was confirmed by the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. reported in 267 ITR 272 wherein their Lordships examined the earlier decisions of the Apex Court with regard to binding nature of the Circular and laid down that when a circular issued by the Board remains in operation then the Revenue is bound by it and cannot be allowed to plead that it is not valid or that it is contrary to the terms of the statute. The appeal under consideration has certainly been filed contrary to the Circular issued by the CBDT Circular No.17 dated 08.08.2019.
In the event, the Revenue finds at a later point of time that the tax effect in the appeal is more than Rs.50 lakhs or despite low tax effect the appeal of the revenue is maintainable, the revenue is at liberty to move this Tribunal for recalling of this order.
Assessment Year: 2015-16 Kirankumar Rasilkal Sanghvi 7. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue (in for AY.2015-16) is dismissed. Order pronounced on 17/09/2021 by placing result on notice board.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Ratnabali Capital Markets Private Limited…Kolkata18 Nov 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. This was based on the fact that the tax effect of the disputed additions was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
- Income Tax Officer, Ward - 12(1), Kolkata vs Poobong Plantation Pvt Ltd., KolkataKolkata23 Sept 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to the low tax effect, which is below the prescribed limits as per the relevant CBDT Circular. The circular's provisions regarding monetary limits for fil...
- Income Tax Officer, Haldia vs Contai Cooperative Agriculture and Rural…Kolkata2 Sept 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was due to the tax effect of the disputed additions being below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
- Income Tax Officer, Burdwan vs Panchra Union Co Operative Agricultural…Kolkata28 Aug 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. The circular's revised monetary limits apply retrospectively to pending appeals and are binding...
- DCIT, Cir-2, Asansol, Aayakar Bhawan vs Hlg Memorial Hospital Pvt. Ltd…Kolkata21 Feb 2024Dismissed
Also relies on Commissioner of Customs v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, appeals with a tax effect of Rs. 50 lakhs or less should not be filed by the Revenue. This circular is applicable retrospectively to pending appeals.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026