ABDULLAH BIN RASHEED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(4), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek reinstatement if the scheme was not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals before the ITAT for AY 2008-09. They subsequently opted to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme and had filed the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Both the captioned appeals are filed by the assessees. is filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad in appeal No.10016/2019-20/A3/CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad dated 30/08/2019. The other appeal Ld. CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad in appeal No.10022/2019-20/A3/CIT(A)-6, dated 25/09/2019. Both these appeals are passed U/s. 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2008-09.
At the outset, Ld.AR submitted before us that both the assessees desire to withdraw their respective appeals as the assessees have opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. He further submitted that the assessees had filed Form No.1 & 2 and also received Form-3 from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the instant appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld.AR.
Having heard both the parties through video conference, We are inclined to allow the appeals of the assessees to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the Ld. AR as the assessees in the present appeals have preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and also received Form No.3 from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the Ld. AR. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss both the appeals of the assessees as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee/s case/s are not accepted in the Vivad-Se- Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee/s shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition/s before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate their respective appeal/s. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, two appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on 12th May, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026