SHRI CHANDRESH DHIRENDRABHAI THAKKAR,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(6), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal and the Departmental Representative raised no objection. Consequently, the Tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer. The assessee subsequently submitted a letter stating they did not wish to press the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM
O R D E R
PER Dr. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal is preferred by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 24.07.2018, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Surat [in short “the CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”].
Before us, the assessee by way of a letter dated 21.09.2021, submitted that he did not wish to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative (in short the “the ld. DR”) did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
Assessment Year: 2009-10 Chandresh Dhirendrabhai Thakkar
In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in AY.2009-10) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced on 22/09/2021 at the time of Virtual Court Hearing.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026