ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH HYDERABAD RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 242/HYD/2014Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 June 2021AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that Form-3 had been issued. However, it allowed the assessee to seek revival of the case if the settlement benefit is denied for technical reasons.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2009-10. Subsequently, the assessee sought settlement under the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020' and was issued Form-3.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and Form-3 has been issued.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B” : HYDERABAD

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU

PER S.S.GODARA, J.M. :

1.

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2009-10 arises against the DCIT, Circle-1(1), Hyderabad’s assessment dated 03-12-2013 involving proceedings u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’].

2.

At the outset, we are informed during the course of hearing from the assessee’s side that it has filed for settlement benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ in prescribed Form No.1 & 2 and Form-3 in tune thereto; also stands issued.

3.

The assessee’s sole identical plea in this case is that since the department is yet to finalise the settlement in tune with Form(s)-3 issued under the scheme, this appeal may not be dismissed as withdrawn as on date. We find no merit in assessee’s contentions per se. The fact remains that the assessee has already been issued Form-3, no purpose would be served if this case is kept pending. We therefore order that this appeal be treated as dismissed as withdrawn with a rider that it shall be very much open for the assessee to file for revival of this case, if the settlement benefit under the scheme is denied to it for technical reasons.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd June, 2021

More judgments on Section 144C(5)

All 865 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →