DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KANPUR vs. SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL (HUF), KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and a settlement order was passed. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and obtained a certificate for full and final settlement of tax arrears.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's successful settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER T.S. KAPOOR, A.M.: This is Revenue’s appeal against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-I, Kanpur, dated 28.11.2018 for assessment year 2014-15. 2. The assessee has submitted an application dated 16.10.2021, received by the Registry of this Office on 2.11.2021, vide which it has been submitted that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur has issued certificate in Form No.3 on 9.12.2020 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The copy of such Form has also been filed. The assessee has also filed the copy of Form No.5, i.e. the order of the PCIT-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the DTVSVA, 2020. It was contended that since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and tax payable on the Departmental appeals has been deposited and order for final settlement of tax arrears has been passed by the designated authority, therefore, the appeal filed by the Department may be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld. D. R. has no objection. Accordingly, since Form No. 3 has been generated in the Departmental appeal and order has been passed by the PCIT-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the DTVSVA, 2020, the appeal of the Department is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 16/12/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026