SHRI ADARSH BHATIA, HUF,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel submitted an application to withdraw the appeal due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee later applied for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and the dispute was settled.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 04.10.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Panchkula.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that since the assessee had moved an application for 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,2020' and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No.3, thus settling the dispute, therefore, he
ITA -1605/CHD/2019 A.Y. 2016-17 Page 2 of 2 intends to withdraw the present appeal. A separate application dated 23.12.2020 for withdrawal of the appeal has been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. The ld. DR has no objection for the said withdrawal.
In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as 'Withdrawn'
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026