KEDAR COTTON INDUSTRIES,MEHSANA vs. ACIT, MEHSANA CIRCLE, MEHSANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the scheme benefits were not availed for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R
PER BENCH:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 05.02.2018 arising in the assessment order dated 09.03.2016 passed by the ACIT, Mehsana Circle, Mehsana under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2013-14.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue [Kedar Cotton Industriea vs. AC IT] A.Y. 2013-14 - 2 - the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 06/01/2021
Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MADHUMITA ROY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 06/01/2021 True Copy TANMAY आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026