SH. BHAGWAN DASS GARG,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-II, LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and made a prayer for withdrawal of the appeals. The Revenue had no objection to this prayer.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2004-05 and 2006-07. During the hearing, the assessee submitted that they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn, given the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JM & SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA, AM
ORDER आदेश आदेश PER DIVA SINGH By the present appeals, the assessee assails the correctness of the separate order dated 08.06.2017 of CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana pertaining to 2004-05 and 2006-07 assessment year respectively on various grounds.
However at the time of hearing, ld. AR submitted that the assessee has availed of “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” by way of filing an application which has been accepted by the Department by issuance of Form No.
Copy filed. In these circumstances, relying
ITA-1254 & 1255/CHD/2017 A.Y. 2004-05 & 2006-07 Page 2 of 2 upon the separate applications dated 28.01.2021 prayer for withdrawal of the appeals is made.
3. The ld. Sr.DR Smt. Meenakshi Vohra on a perusal of record had no objection to the prayer of the assessee.
We have heard the submissions and perused the material on record. In the aforementioned peculiar facts and circumstances considering the record and the submissions, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Said order was pronounced at the time of virtual hearing itself in the presence of the parties via Webex.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 12th Feb., 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026