Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH:
This appeal filed by the assessee for AY 2014-15 is directed against CIT(A) – 5, Hyderabad’s order, dated 12/12/2018 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ in :- 2 -: Rohit Goyal (HUF), Adilabad.
prescribed Form No.1 & 2 and received Form(s)-3 in tune thereto, which is placed on record, and, therefore, requested the Bench to permit to withdraw this appeal of the assessee.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and received Form(s)-3 in tune thereto, with a rider that it shall be very much open for the assessee to file for revival of this case, if the settlement benefit under the scheme is denied to it for technical reasons.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 23rd July, 2021.