M/S ULTIMATE AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, C-2(1), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals. This was based on the assessees availing the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the Income Tax Department issuing Form 3 in response to their applications.
What were the facts?
The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT. Subsequently, they opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020' and received Form No. 3 from the Income Tax Department. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed before the ITAT should be dismissed as withdrawn, given the assessees' participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपील सं./ िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Sh Sanjeev Sharma, The ITO, बनाम SCO 360, Ist Floor, Ward 4(4), Sector 32D, Chandigarh Chandigarh �थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ABZPS4750K अपीलाथ�/Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent िनधा�रती क� ओर से/Assessee by : Sh Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज�व क� ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 30.03.2021 उदघोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 30.03.2021 आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Bench:
These appeals are filed by the different assessees against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh dated 19.3.2021, Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh orders dated 19.3.2021, 27.10.2019 and 17.01.2017 respectively.
Separate applications dated 19.3.2021 (ITA Nos 1447/Chd/2019, 951/Chd/2018 and 1585/Chd/2019 and 26.3.2021 (ITA No. 699/Chd/2017) with identical substance for withdrawal of the aforesaid appeals have been moved by the assessees stating therein that since they have opted for ‘Vivad Se Vishvas Scheme 2020’ and have received form No. 3 in each case from the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax vide following acknowledgements as per details given below and copies of the same have also been placed on record.
S.no. A.Y. Ack. number 1 1447/Chd/2019 M/s Ultimate Automobiles 2012-13 247426240090221 Pvt Ltd 2 951/Chd/2018 M/s P.H. Houses P Ltd 2012-13 255676520130221 3 1585/Chd/2019 M/s Sagar Banquets P Ltd. 2015-16 338735550180520 4 699/Chd/2017 Shri Sanjeev Sharma 2009-10 24054671040221
In the present cases, it is noticed that the assessees have availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 in each case to the assessees for requisite assessment year, in response to the applications filed by the assessees, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore, the appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. Sr. DR did not object if the aforesaid appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In view of the above the aforesaid appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed. (Order pronounced on 30.03.2021)
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026