SH. MAHARAJ KRISHAN GUPTA & SONS (HUF),LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-6(4), LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the dispute was settled under the VSV Scheme, as evidenced by Form No. 3 issued by the Department. Therefore, the assessee's application to withdraw the appeals was accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the CIT(A) orders for AY 2011-12. The assessee's application for settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' was accepted by the Income Tax Department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member:
The above two appeals relate to the assessee in his individual capacity and to his HUF and have been preferred & 671/Chd/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 Page 2 of 4 against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Ludhiana dated 19.03.2019 and 14.03.2019 respectively, passed u/s 250(6)) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’. Both the appeals relate to assessment year 2011-12.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that since the assessee’s application for settling the dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'(VSV) has been accepted by the Income Tax Department and Form No.3 has been issued evidencing the same, therefore, he intends to withdraw the present appeals. Separate applications dated 23.02.2021 for withdrawal of both the appeals have been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. The ld. DR did not object to the same.
We have perused the records and documents before us and find that the dispute in both the appeals stands settled under the VSV Scheme, which is evidenced by Form No.3 issued by the Department in this respect dated 26.10.2020 in both the cases. In view of the same, the assessees’ application to withdraw the appeal is accepted. & 671/Chd/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 Page 3 of 4
In the result, both the appeals, therefore, are hereby dismissed as 'Withdrawn'.
Order pronounced on 24.02.2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) �या�यक सद�य/ Judicial Member लेखा सद�य/ Accountant Member Dated: 25th February, 2021 *रती* आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026