CONCEPT INFRA BUSINESS PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, noting compliance with the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI P.M. JAGTAP & CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
O R D E R Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar dated 3.7.2017 for the assessment year 2013-14.
In this case, the assessee has moved an application dated 10.11.2020 seeking withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that he has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 and the Designated Authority has issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme accepting the assessee’s declaration under the same Scheme.
P a g e 1 | 2 14/CTK/201 7 Assessm ent Y ear : 20 13- 14
Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed treating the same as withdrawn. We also make it clear that in a situation, the grievance of assessee for the year under consideration could not be resolved under Vivad se Vishwas scheme, then the assessee would be entitled to seek recall of this dismissal order by filing a miscellaneous application.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 28 /1/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026