SHAH BABULAL DHANRAJ -HUF,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1622/AHD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 February 2021AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeals. It was clarified that if the assessees fail to avail the benefits of the VSV Scheme for bonafide reasons, they can seek restoration of their original appeals.

What were the facts?

The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT for various assessment years. During the hearing, the counsels for the assessees submitted that they wished to withdraw the appeals as they had opted to avail the benefits of the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'. The Revenue representative had no objection.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeals should be withdrawn by the assessees who had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA

For Respondent: Shri Alok Kumar, Sr. D.R

आदेश/O R D E R

PER BENCH:

1.

The captioned five appeals arise from the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) against different assessment years.

& 4 Ors. (Shah Babulal Dhanraj HUF & Ors.) - 2 -

2.

The captioned assessees have sought to withdraw the appeals listed above on the ground that they have opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsels for the assessee at the outset have submitted that they do not seek to pursue the said appeals owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that their applications for withdrawal of appeals may please be granted. Reference was also made to written requests in this regard.

3.

The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

4.

In the light of oral/written requests made on behalf of the captioned parties, all the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeals for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, all captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

This Order pronounced on 23/02/2021

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →