RHEUMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION HYDERABAD CHAPTER,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the CIT(E) with a direction to provide a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and then decide the issue of registration under Section 12AA on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT after a significant delay, which was condoned. The assessee contended that the CIT(E) rejected their application for registration under Section 12AA without providing a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly afforded an opportunity of hearing to the assessee before rejecting the registration application under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(E), Hyderabad’s order, dated 26/09/2019 involving proceedings u/s 12 AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short “the Act”].
At the outset, we observe that there is a delay of 276 days in filing the appeal before the tribunal. Ld.counsel for assessee filed an affidavit explaining reasons for the delay and prayed for condonation of the delay. Being satisfied with the reasons
:- 2 -: M/s Rheumatology Association Hyderabad Chapter, Hyd stated in the application for condonation of delay, we condone the same and proceed with the appeal. 2. Ld.counsel for the assessee during the course of hearing submitted that ld.CIT(E) rejected application for registration u/s 12AA of the Act without affording proper opportunity of hearing to assessee. Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice, the matter may be restored to his file for deciding grounds of appeal s on merits.
3. The learned DR agreed with the aforesaid statement of the learned AR.
4. We have considered the facts of the case and the request made by the learned AR. We are of the view that interest of justice will be served if the matter is restored to the file of CIT(E) for deciding various grounds of appeal of the assessee. Accordingly, the CIT(E) is directed to afford reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and thereafter decide the issue of registration u/s 12AA. We direct the assessee to appear before CIT(E) on or before 30th November, 2021 with all the relevant evidences; at his own risk and responsibility to be followed by three effective opportunities of hearing.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Pronounced in the open court on 27th August, 2021. Sd/- Sd/- (S.S. GODARA) (L. P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Hyderabad Dated: 27th August, 2021. *gmv
:- 3 -: M/s Rheumatology Association Hyderabad Chapter, Hyd
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026