GUJTRON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's intention to resolve the issue under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and accepted the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed based on the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2012-2013. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to resolve the issue.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's desire to withdraw the appeal and settle the matter under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ D’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2 Ahmedabad, dated 16/10/2012 arising in the matter of penalty order passed under s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-2013.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is noticed that the assessee has filed a letter dated 16/03/2021 stating that the assessee wants to resolve the issue with the department by availing benefit under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and therefore the appeal of the Assessee required to be withdrawn in terms of scheme. The assessee has filed copy of form no. 3 being the certificate issue under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Ld.D.R has no objection if the appeal of the Assessee is treated to be withdrawn in terms of the scheme opted by the assessee.
In the light of the above submission made by the assessee, we find no reason to keep the appeal pending of the Assessee before the Tribunal. Accordingly the appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for adjudication before the ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed under VSV Scheme.
Order pronounced in the Court on 17/03/2021 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026