M/S TIBETAN DELEK HOSPITAL,DHARAMSHALA vs. DCIT, (E), C-2, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee has availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the Revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2010-11. During the hearing, the assessee submitted that they have opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JM
Hearing conducted via Webex आदेश/ORDER
By the present appeal, the assessee assails the correctness of the order dated 14.02.2019 of CIT(A), Palampur pertaining to 2010-11 assessment year on various grounds.
However at the time of hearing, ld. AR submitted that the assessee has availed of “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” by way of filing an application which has been accepted by the Department by issuance of Form No.
3. Copy filed. In these circumstances, relying upon the application dated 03.04.2021 prayer for withdrawal of the appeal is made.
ITA750/CHD/2019 A.Y. 2010-11 Page 2 of 2
The ld. Sr.DR Shri Ashok Khanna on a perusal of record had no objection to the prayer of the assessee.
I have heard the submissions and perused the material on record. In the aforementioned peculiar facts and circumstances considering the record and the submissions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Said order was pronounced at the time of virtual hearing itself in the presence of the parties via Webex.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 20th April,2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026