PATAN JILLA SHIKSHAN SAMITINI PRATHMIK SHALAONA SHIKSHAKONI DHIRAN & GRAHAK SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,PATAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, PATAN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal rejected the adjournment petition and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if they failed to avail the VSV benefit for a bona fide reason.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. During the hearing, the assessee sought an adjournment to avail the benefit under the Vivad se Vishwas (VSV) scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's intention to avail the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ D’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Gandhinagar, dated 28/12/2018 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-2013.
When the case was called for hearing, the ld.counsel for the assessee filed an application dated 17/03/2021 seeking adjournment on the ground that assessee is looking for availing benefit under Vivad se Vishwas (“VSV”). He further submitted that he does not have any objection to withdraw the appeal if the Bench dismisses the same by passing the conditional order that the appeal can be restored in the event the assessee fails to avail the benefit of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme for any bona-fide reason. Accordingly, the ld. AR prayed that the assessee may be permitted to withdraw its appeal.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee, in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of above submission of both the parties, we reject the adjournment petition and the appeal filed by the assessee stand dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reason, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for adjudication before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as being withdrawn under VSV scheme.
Order pronounced in the Court on 22/03/2021 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026