SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATION(SEVA),KUTURLA vs. CIT(EXMP), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matters to the file of the CIT(Exemption) to decide the issues afresh after providing sufficient opportunity to the assessees to submit all required documents and evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected these applications due to a lack of information.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the applications for registration and approval without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessees to furnish necessary documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
2 ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Saroj Kumar Mahapatra, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 21/07/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 21/07/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These nine appeals have been filed by the different assessees against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(Exemption), Hyderabad, dated 22.03.2023 & 16.03.2023, for the assessment year 2023-2024.
It was submitted by the ld.AR that the ld.CIT(E) has dismissed the appeals of the assessees rejecting the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB seeking registration u/s.12AB of the Act on the ground of absence of information. It was further the submission of the ld.AR that the ld.CIT(E) has also rejected the application of the assessee filed in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act. It was also the submission that ld. CIT(E) without providing sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee-trust, rejected both the applications of the assessee which is gross violation of principles of natural justice. It was the submission that the assessees in the present cases may be given one more opportunity to furnish all the evidences regarding registration u/s.12AB of the Act as well as approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act. It was the prayer of the assessees that the matter may kindly be restored to the file of ld.CIT(E) to decide the issues afresh in the interest of justice.
Ld. CIT-DR objected to the above contention of the ld.AR and submitted that sufficient opportunity was provided by the ld.CIT(E), however, the assessee could not substantiate its claim. Therefore, it was 3 ITA Nos.180-188/CTK/2023 the prayer of the ld. AR that the appeals of the assessees should be dismissed.
We have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(E) shows that the assessees could not submit any information or documentary evidences in regard to the claim of the assessees for registration u/s.12AB of the Act and the approval u/s.80G(5) of the Act, resulting into dismissal of the appeals of the assessees arising out of above applications. However, the ld.AR before us submitted that the assessees may be given one more opportunity to produce all the relevant documents and evidences before the ld.CIT(E) to substantiate its claim. In view of the above, in the interest of justice, we restore the issues in the appeals to the file of ld.CIT(E) to decide the issues afresh after providing sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessees. The assessees are directed to submit all the required documents before the ld.CIT(E) for early disposal of the appeals.
In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 21/07/2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (GIRISH AGRAWAL) (GEORGE MATHAN) ऱेखा सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER कटक Cuttack; ददनाांक Dated 21/07/2023 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.
प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 2.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026