M/S. ZYDUS HOSPIRA ONCOLOGY PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' request to withdraw the appeals, noting that their applications under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme had been approved. The assessees were granted liberty to file Miscellaneous Applications if any issues remained unresolved under the scheme.
What were the facts?
Seven appeals were filed by different assessees before the ITAT. The assessees sought to withdraw these appeals as they had opted to avail benefits under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn by the assessees who have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 4 of Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singh
आदेश/ORDER PER BENCH:-
Page No 2 Zydus Hospira Oncology P. Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT & six others
These seven appeals filed by different assessees, arise from order of the CIT(A), in proceedings under Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.
The assessees filed written submissions to withdraw the appeals on the ground that they have opted to avail benefits of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and in their submissions the assessees have also enclosed the copies form no. -3 issued by the Pr. CIT of Income Tax for approving the application filed by the assessees under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsels for the assessees at the outset have submitted that they do not want to pursue the said appeals and requested that their applications for withdrawal of appeals may please be granted.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessees.
We have considered the submissions and applications of the assessees for withdrawal of the appeals as their applications have been approved under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A reference has been made in sub-section (2) & (3) of section 4 of Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 for the purpose of withdrawal of appeal. In the light of the provision made in the scheme and after considering the material on record, the aforesaid requests for withdrawal of appeals of the assessees to avail the VSV Scheme, 2020 in accordance with law is allowed. However, in case, any issue is remained un-resolved under the said scheme, then, the assessees will be at liberty to Page No 3 Zydus Hospira Oncology P. Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT & six others file the Miscellaneous Applications to recall this order to restore the original appeals within the time limit provided in the act.
In the result, all the seven appeals filed by different assessees are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 12-04-2021 Sd/- Sd/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (AMARJIT SINGH) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 12/04/2021 आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026