SHRI RAMESHBHAI CHATURBHAI PRAJAPATI,MEHSANA vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 66/AHD/2020Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 May 2021AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn. It also noted that the assessees could seek restoration of their appeals if they failed to avail the VSV Scheme for bonafide reasons.

What were the facts?

The assessees sought to withdraw their appeals before the ITAT. They had opted to avail benefits under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED

For Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 31/05/2021

06/05/2021 सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing 31/05/2021 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH:

The captioned six appeals and one cross objection arise from the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) against different assessment years.

2.

The captioned assessees have sought to withdraw the appeals listed above on the ground that they have opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). When the 06 others - 2 - matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsels for the assessee at the outset have submitted that they do not seek to pursue the said appeals owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that their applications for withdrawal of appeals may please be granted. Reference was also made to written requests in this regard.

3.

The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

4.

In the light of oral/written requests made on behalf of the captioned parties, all the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. In fact, the C.O. is also dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeals for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, all captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

This Order pronounced on 31/05/2021

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →