SHRI JAYANTH MURTHY,AHMEDABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE 4 (2), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn, allowing the assessees to pursue the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. However, it granted liberty to the assessees to seek restoration of their appeals if they failed to avail the scheme for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessees in four different appeals sought to withdraw their cases. The reason for withdrawal was their decision to avail the benefits of the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'. The Revenue had no objection to this request.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R
PER BENCH:
The captioned four appeals arise from the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) against different assessment years.
The captioned assessees have sought to withdraw the appeals listed above on the ground that they have opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsels for the assessee at the outset have submitted that they do not seek to pursue the said appeals owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that their applications for withdrawal of 03 others - 2 - appeals may please be granted. Reference was also made to written requests in this regard.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of oral/written requests made on behalf of the captioned parties, all the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeals for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, all captioned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced on 28/05/2021
Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 28/05/2021 TRUE COPY TANMAY आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद । 1.Date of dictation on 23.04.2021 As per VSVA Format 2.Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 23.04.2021 3.Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S. .04.2021 4.Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement .04.2021 5.Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S .04.2021 6.Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 28.05.2021 7.Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………. 8.The date on which the file goes to the Asstt. Registrar for signature on the order…………………… 9.Date of Despatch of the Order………
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026