BIOTECH OPTHALMICS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no reason to keep the appeal pending and accordingly dismissed the assessee's appeal. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if they failed to avail the scheme benefits for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to resolve the dispute with the department by availing the benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessee filed a certificate under the scheme, and the revenue had no objection.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ C’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Ahmedabad, dated 29/03/2017 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-2013.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is noticed that the assessee has filed a letter dated 04/06/2021 stating that the assessee wants to resolve the issue with the department by availing benefit under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and therefore the appeal of the Assessee required to be withdrawn in terms of scheme. The assessee has filed copy of form no. 3 being the certificate issue under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Ld.D.R has no objection if the appeal of the Assessee is treated to be withdrawn in terms of the scheme opted by the assessee.
In the light of the above submission made by the assessee, we find no reason to keep the appeal pending of the Assessee before the Tribunal. Accordingly the appeal of the Assessee stands dismissed. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for adjudication before the ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed under VSV Scheme.
Order pronounced in the Court on 28/06/2021 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026