HEART FOUNDATION OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT lacked the jurisdiction to cancel the registration as it was not the prescribed authority. Furthermore, the Tribunal ruled that the cancellation of registration cannot be retrospective under Section 12AB(4) of the Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, had its registration cancelled retrospectively by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT). The cancellation was based on allegations of providing freebies to doctors, violating medical council regulations, which were discovered during a search on a pharmaceutical company and a survey on the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT had the jurisdiction to cancel the trust's registration and whether such cancellation could be retrospective.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT148 citing135 Taxmann.com 286 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Max India Ltd.68 citing388 ITR 81 · 2016 · HC
- Oxford Academy for Career Development v. Chief CIT37 citing315 ITR 382 · 2009 · HC
- Auro Lab v. ITO27 citing411 ITR 308 · 2019 · HC
- Indian Medical Trust v. PCIT13 citing414 ITR 296 · 2019 · HC · Read judgment
- Dilip Tanaji Kashid v. M.l. Karmakar PR. CIT& ANR.10 citing304 CTR 436 · 2018 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI
Before: VIKAS AWASTHY & MS. PADMAVATHY S.
PER : MS PADMAVATHY S. (AM)
This appeal is against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income- tax (Central), Pune (in short, ‗PCIT‘) dated 06/03/2013 passed under section 12AB(4) of the Income-tax Act,1961 (‗the Act‘).
The assesse is a charitable trust set up vide trust deed dated April 21, 1988. The Trust was granted registration under section 12A of the Act vide
2 ITA 1524/Mum/2023 Heart Foundation of India certificate dated July 21, 1889. The assessee has been carrying on its activities in accordance with the trust deed since its in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB(4)
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- S R Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemotions), MumbaiITA 7266/MUM/2026[2027]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- S R Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemption), MumbaiITA 7265/MUM/2026[2027]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Marwari Kanwar Sangh, Deogarh vs Exemption Ward, DhanbadITA 406/RAN/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2027-28
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026