RAVULA DASARATHA RAMAIAH GOWD, NELLORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NELLORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The assessee was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal to reinstate the appeal if the Vivad Se Vishwas application is rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2009-10. The assessee had already filed forms under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and received Form 3 from the department.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara
O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, J.M. This assessee’s appeal for A.Y 2009-10 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Tirupati’s order dated 21.02.2020, in case No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2019-20/1025560702(1) involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”).
Heard both parties. Case file perused.
At the outset, the ld. authorized representative of the assessees submitted that the assessees does not want to pursue the appeal as he has already filed forms I & II under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ and received Form 3 from the department. Assessee also filed Form 4 and was awaiting for Form 5. Therefore, consequent to the same, the assessees desires to withdraw the appeal before the Tribunal. Hence it was pleaded, that the appeal of the assessee may be treated as withdrawn.
The ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld. AR.
After hearing both the parties, according to the request of the assessee and their Ld. AR, we hereby allow the appeal of the assessees to be withdrawn. We also make it clear that the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal within the stipulated time as provided under the Act, in order to reinstate the appeal, if his application with respect to Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is rejected.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026