DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. INVESCO (HYDERABAD)PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal to be withdrawn. The Revenue was granted liberty to seek reinstatement if the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme application was rejected.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order related to proceedings under section 271C of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara
O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, J.M. This Revenue’s appeal for A.Y 2013-14 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 8, Hyderabad’s order dated 23.03.2018, in case No.10081/CIT(A)-8/Hyd/2015-16 involving proceedings under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. We accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
At the outset, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the Revenue does not want to pursue the appeal as the assessee has already filed forms I & II under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ and got issued Form 3, Forms 4 and 5. Therefore, consequent to the same, the Revenue desires to withdraw the appeal before the Tribunal. Hence it was pleaded, that the appeal of the Revenue may be treated as withdrawn.
After hearing the learned departmental representative, we hereby allow the appeal of the Revenue to be withdrawn. We also make it clear that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal within the stipulated time as provided under the Act, in order to reinstate the appeal, if its application with respect to Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is rejected.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
More judgments on Section 271C
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Jagadish Panchal, Udaipur vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 314/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Teampumkin Corporation, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer (TDS)-2(3)(2), MumbaiITA 5318/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Teampumkin Corporation, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer (TDS)-2(3)(2) Mumbai…ITA 5281/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026