DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC 5(2) CENTRAL RANGE-5, MUMBAI vs. M/S. WELLKNOWN BUSINESS VENTURES LLP, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's case fell under the exceptions notified by the CBDT, making the third proviso to Section 10(38) and the conditions under Section 112A not applicable in a manner that denied the exemption. The Ld. CIT(A) was therefore correct in deleting the additions.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of taxable long-term capital gains (LTCG) on the sale of listed shares. The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(38) and later under Section 112A, arguing that the shares were acquired before the STT regime or fell under specific exceptions notified by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the long-term capital gains on the sale of listed shares are eligible for exemption under Section 10(38) or beneficial provisions of Section 112A, considering the mode of acquisition and payment of STT, and if the transactions fall under the exceptions notified by the CBDT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(38),Section 112A,Section 55(2)(ac)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, AM
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the action of the Ld. CIT (A)-53, Mumbai [in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] vide his orders dated 13.05.2022 passed for Assessment Years [in short ‘AYs’] 2018-19 & 2019-20 in relation to the assessment orders dated 19.06.2021 & 13.05.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle 5(2), Mumbai [in short ‘AO’].
Since the iss
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026