PROCTER & GAMGLE HYGIENE& HEALTHCARE,LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIR 7(1), MUMBAI

ITA 6591/MUM/2010Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 August 2023AY 2004-0552 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that expenditure incurred on the production of advertising films is revenue in nature, especially when incurred in the ongoing business. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal allowed the expenditure.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a company engaged in manufacturing and selling healthcare products, incurred expenditure on the production of television films for advertisement. The Assessing Officer treated this expenditure as capital in nature and disallowed it, allowing only depreciation. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.

What were the issues?

Whether expenditure incurred on the production of television advertisement films is capital or revenue expenditure.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "J" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd., P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400009 [PAN: AAACP6332M] …………… ……………. Tax – Circle 7(1), Mumbai Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8(2), Mumbai, Room No. 216-A, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road, Mumbai …………… Appellant Vs Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd., P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400009 ……………. Respondent [PAN: AAACP6332M] Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd., P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakkala, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400009 [PAN: AAACP6332M] …………… ……………. Tax – Circle 7(1), Mumbai

ITA. No. 6591 & 6549/Mum/2010 (AY 2004-05) ITA. No. 2780 & 2849/Mum/2011 (AY 2005-06) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8(2), Mumbai, Room No. 216-A, OR 209, 2nd Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road, Near Churchgate , Mumbai - 400020 …………… Appellant Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Vs Healthcare Ltd., P & G Plaz

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 37

All 4,334 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →