TULSIDAS V. PATEL PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5(3)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the leave and license fees were assessable under the head 'Profits & Gains of Business' because the company's objects included leasing and providing services, and the administrator was operating within these parameters. The Tribunal distinguished the case from precedents where renting was ancillary.
What were the facts?
The appellant company, managed by a court-appointed administrator, received leave and license fees from flats held as stock-in-trade. The Assessing Officer treated this income as 'Income from House Property' instead of 'Profits & Gains of Business'.
What were the issues?
Whether income from licensing of flats held as stock-in-trade, managed by an administrator, should be taxed as 'Income from House Property' or 'Profits & Gains of Business'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3)(ii),Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. v. CIT381 citing373 ITR 673 · 2015 · SC
- Karanpura Development Co. Ltd. v. CIT157 citing44 ITR 362 · 1962 · SC · Read judgment
- Sultan Bros. (P) Ltd. v. CIT148 citing51 ITR 353 · 1964 · SC
- East India Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. v. CIT147 citing42 ITR 49 · 1961 · SC
- Mangla Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO28 citing325 ITR 281 · 2010 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, E BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
By way of the present appeal the Appellant has challenged the order, 1. dated 30/11/2016, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as „the CIT(A)‟] for the Assessment Year 2012-13, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the Appellant against the Assessment Order, dated 23/03/2015, passed under Section 143(3)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟).
The Appellant has raised following grounds of appeal: 2. “1. Ground No. 1 : Denial of the claim of Appellant to compute income under the head "Profits & Gains of Bus
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234B
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026