ESTATE OF RAMNIKLAL RAJMAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-8(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored all issues to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, following a coordinate bench's decision in a prior assessment year. The residential status of the deceased is crucial and was not adequately dealt with by the lower authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, the estate of a deceased individual, is appealing additions made under Section 69A for peak balances in foreign bank accounts. A key issue is the deceased's residential status at the time of death, which impacts the taxability of foreign income.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the correct residential status of the deceased assessee for determining taxability of foreign income. The validity of search proceedings on a deceased person and the AO's failure to provide relied-upon information were also raised.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” Bench, Mumbai.
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail (JM)
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench :-
All these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against a common order dated 30.11.2022 passed by the learned CIT(A), Mumbai and they relate to A.Y. 2011-12 to 2015-16. All these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order, for the sake of convenience.
In all these years, the assessee is aggrieved by the decision of the learned CIT(A) in confirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 69A of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026