JAGDISH GURJAR,BHILWARA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE, BHILWARA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 93/JODH/2019Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur23 March 2023AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was deprived of contesting the case on merit before the CIT(A). In the interest of equity and justice, the assessee should be given another opportunity to argue the case.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against an addition of Rs. 8,97,450/- made by the AO. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard on merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without granting the assessee an opportunity to present their case on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 133(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI MANISH BORAD

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Chhajed, CA
For Respondent: Shri S.M. Joshi, JCIT-DR
Hearing: 22/03/2023

Assessee By Shri Hemant Chhajed, CA Revenue By Shri S.M. Joshi, JCIT-DR Date of hearing 22/03/2023 Date of 23 /03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R PER: SHRI MANISH BORAD, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Ajmer dated 23-08-2017 for the assessment year 2014-15 raising therein solitary ground of appeal as under:-

SHRI JAGDISH GURJAR VS ACIT, CIRCLE, BHILWARA ‘’The impugned addition of Rs.,97,450/- made to the return income in the order u/s 143(3) dated 01-12- 2016 are bad in law and on facts for want of jurisdiction and small reason and hence the same kindly be deleted.’’ 2.1 We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record wherein it is noticed that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned order dated 23-08-2017 ex-parte by observing as under:-

‘’4.2 I have gone through the assessment order and grounds of appeal carefully. It is seen that the addition has ben made by the AO on the basis of information received by the AO u/s 133(6) from Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (HZL). Before making addition, the assessee was given the opportunity to reconcile the difference between the payment shown by the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (HZL) to the appellant and receipt shown by the appellant from Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (HZL). During the course of appellate proceedings, the appellant has not furnished any written submission on the issue. Therefore, in view of the facts discussed by the AO in the assessment order, the addition of Rs.8,97,460/- made by the AO is hereby confirmed. 5.0 In the result, the appeal is dismissed.’’ From the records, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee in view of the assessment order dated 01-12- 2016 but it appears that the assessee was deprived off to contest the case before the ld. CIT(A) on merit. We feel that in the interest of equity and justice, the assessee should be provided one more opportunity to argue the case before the ld. CIT(A). Hence, the appeal

SHRI JAGDISH GURJAR VS ACIT, CIRCLE, BHILWARA of the assessee is restored to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for providing opportunity of being heard to the assessee and the assessee is also directed to submit the necessary papers/ written submission before the ld. CIT(A) to argue the case without taking any adjournment on frivolous ground. Thus the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

3.0 In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 23 /03/2023.

More judgments on Section 133(6)

All 7,227 judgments and leading authorities on Section 133(6) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →