M/S ZEE MEDIA CORPORATION LIMITED (EARLIER M/S MAURYA T.V. PVT LTD),MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-16(1)(3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 972/MUM/2023Status: HeardITAT Mumbai22 September 2023AY 2014-20156 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that there was an apparent mistake on record due to a technical fault in uploading the ITR. The case was restored to the Assessing Officer to provide the deduction under Section 54 after verification.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed exemption under Section 54 for long-term capital gains from selling a flat, but due to a technical error during e-filing, this exemption was not reflected in the uploaded return. Consequently, the CPC raised a demand based on the full capital gain.

What were the issues?

Whether a technical error in uploading an ITR can prevent the allowance of a legitimate exemption, and if the CIT(A) should have considered the exemption as a fresh claim.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 54,Section 154,Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,

Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH

For Appellant: Shri. Aditya Ramchandran
For Respondent: Shri. Prakash Kishinchandani
Hearing: 07.09.2023Pronounced: 22.09.2023

आदेश की प्रतितलति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant P a g e | 6 AY 2014-15 Vanaja Omprakash Seluka

More judgments on Section 54

All 1,745 judgments and leading authorities on Section 54 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →