JK INVESTMENT,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amenities provided were an integral part of the premises and inseparable from the rental agreement. Therefore, the claim for deduction was found to have merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partnership firm, claimed a 30% deduction on rental income from amenities, treating it as income from house property. The AO disallowed this deduction, considering the amenities income as income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether rent received for amenities, which are integral to the rented premises, can be treated as income from house property and allowed standard deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 24(1)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER AMARJIT SINGH :-
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ([hereinafter “the Act”] by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 32/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter „the CIT(A)‟] dated 31.03.2023 for A.Y 2012-13. 2. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are as under:
The Ld. CIT(A) has completed the assessment without considering the facts & circumstances of the case, which is contrary to law and is against the principles of natural justice.
P a g e | 2 AY 2012-13 J K Investement
The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in passing the order against appellant without considering the submissions dated 10.02.2021 made by the appellant which are o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026