EVEREST FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD(FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. NARENDRAKUMAR AND CO.),MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -51, MUMBAI

All the four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders passed by Ld CIT(A)-51, Mumbai and they relate to the assessment years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in dismissing the appeals on the reasoning that the assessee has opted to settle the disputes under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

The Ld A.R submitted that the assessing officer has passed two assessment orders in respect of these years. He submitted that the first set of orders were passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, wherein the AO had made

The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee had settled the dispute relating to the additions made in the original assessment proceedings completed u/s 143(3) of the Act. The assessee has not opted for VSVS scheme for the additions made in the impugned assessments, which have been completed consequent to search operations. However, the Ld CIT(A) has erroneously presumed that the assessee has opted to settle the disputes relating to search assessments. Accordingly, he prayed that all the issues may be restored to the file of Ld CIT(A) for adjudicating them on merits.

The Ld D.R did not controvert the submissions made by Ld A.R.

Having regard to the submissions made by Ld A.R, we notice that the assessee has not opted to settle the disputes arising out of search assessments under VSVS scheme. Hence, the ld CIT(A) has fell into error in presuming that the disputes arising out of search assessments have been settled under VSVS scheme. The Ld A.R has clarified that the assessee has opted to settle the disputes arising in the original assessment proceedings only under VSVS scheme. Hence, all the issues urged by the assessee in these appeals need to be adjudicated on merits, first by Ld CIT(A). Accordingly, we set aside the orders passed by Ld CIT(A) in all the years under consideration and restore all the issues to his file for adjudicating them on merits. After providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, the Ld CIT(A) may take appropriate decision in accordance with the law.