UPS EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UPS JETAIR EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED),MUMBAI vs. DY.CIT 3(1) (1) ADDL/JT/DY/CIT/ITO/NFAC-DELHI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the reimbursement of expenses by deleting the adjustment, following previous year's decisions. For dividend distribution tax and TDS, the issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration with specific directions.
What were the facts?
The assessee, UPS Express Pvt. Ltd., challenged transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO and upheld by the DRP for AY 2018-19. The adjustments pertained to technical knowhow fees and reimbursement of expenses. The assessee also disputed interest charged on dividend distribution tax and short credit for TDS.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer pricing adjustments for technical knowhow fees and reimbursement of expenses were justified, and whether interest on dividend distribution tax and TDS credit were correctly handled.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” BENCH, MUMBAI
PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM:
ITA No. 2439/Mum/2022 is filed by UPS Express Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as UPS Jetair Express Pvt. Ltd.) against assessment order passed by the assessment unit (the Ld. AO) for A.Y. 2018-19 dated 25.07.2022 wherein the transfer pricing adjustment of ₹ 16,66,66,521/- is under challenge.
Brief facts of the case shows that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of logistics, supply chain management and e-commerce by combining A.Y.2018-19 UPS Express Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as UPS Jetair Express Pvt. Ltd.)
flow of goods, information and funds. Assessee filed return of income on 30.11.2018 at Rs 55,09,95,353/-. The return of income was picked up fo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026