M/S. SUPRATIVA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-2(2), CUTTACK
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the intimation under section 143(1) was issued in violation of the proviso to Section 143(1) as no show cause notice was issued to the assessee. Therefore, the adjustments made without a show cause notice were not permissible.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society registered u/s.12A, filed its return of income. The AO processed this under section 143(1) and disallowed the entire expenditure claimed due to belated filing of Form 10B, raising a demand. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance and dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of expenditure in an intimation under Section 143(1) is valid without issuing a show cause notice, especially when Form 10B was filed belatedly.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
O R D E R This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 10.08.2023, passed in DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1055034411(1) for the assessment year 2017-2018.
It was submitted by the ld AR that the assessee is a society registered u/s.12A of the Act. It was the further submission that Form 10B was filed belatedly. It was the submission that when the return of income was filed by the assessee, the same was processed by issuance of intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act, wherein the entire expenditure claimed by the assessee was disallowed by raising a demand of Rs.5,89,164/-. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) upheld the adjustment done by the ld. AO on account of belatedly filing of Form 10B by the assessee. Consequently, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. It was the submission that the assessee has not received any show cause notice 2 before issuance of intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act, which was not permissible under the provisions of Section 143(1) of the Act. It was the prayer that the intimation issued u/s.143(1) of the Act may kindly be annulled and the appeal of the assessee be allowed. Apart from the above, ld. AR has filed his written submissions which read as under :-
1.
That, the learned CIT(A) has erred in denying the exemption u/s.11 by stating that audit report in Form No.10B has not been filed before the due date of filing return of income u/s.139. In this regards, it is humbly submitted that filing of audit report is a substantive requirement but the mode and stage of filing is a procedural one and the appellant had already filed the audit report in Fomr-10B on 17.07.2023. the Hon’ble ITAT “D” Bench, Ahmedabad in dated 16.06.2023 had allowed the appeal. Copy of the said order is enclosed for your kind perusal. PRAYER Considering the submissions made herein before it is humbly prayed that a judicious order on merits may kindly be passed taking into consideration the above fact and circumstances of the case. And for this act of your kindness, the appellant as in duty bound shall every pray.
3. In reply, the ld. Sr. DR submitted that no specific reply to the query of ld. CIT(A) regarding filing of Form 10B within the stipulated time, has been submitted by the assessee. It was the submission that the adjustment on account of not considering the expenses towards charitable/religious purposes during the year has been done by the CPC correctly in absence of electronically filed Form No.10B. It was the prayer that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is liable to be upheld.
4. I have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the intimation issued u/s.143(1) of the Act by the AO, clearly shows that the same has been issued in violation of the proviso to Section 143(1) of the Act, insofar
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026