CREDIT GUARANTEE FUND TRUST FOR MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (E), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting and is entitled to the benefits of Section 11 of the Act. The provision for guarantee claims, made on actuarial valuation, was considered a legitimate deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, claimed exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The lower authorities rejected the exemption and disallowed a provision for guarantee claims, arguing the trust was carrying on business activities and not following mercantile accounting. The assessee contended that its objects were charitable and it followed mercantile accounting.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activities fall within the proviso to Section 2(15) and whether provision for guarantee claims is allowable as a deduction under mercantile accounting.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12,Section 2(15),Section 37(1),Section 145
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT901 citing245 ITR 428 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority390 citing449 ITR 1 · 2022 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “C”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN
Per : Kuldip Singh, Judicial Member: The appellant, M/s. Credit Guarantee Fund Trust For Micro And Small Enterprises (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’) by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 22.08.2022 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) [Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi] 2 M/s. Credit Guarantee Fund Trust For Micro And Small Enterprises
(hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] qua the assessment year 2018-19 on the grounds i
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026