SHREE VIGNAHARA TRILOKPATI PARSHWANATH JAIN SHW TIRTH TRUST,RAJSAMAND vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) rejected the application without providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the order was set aside, and the case was remanded for de novo consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for permanent registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for non-compliance and lack of response to notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application without providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, JODHPUR
O R D E R
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:
The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur passed u/s 12AB of the Income Tax (Act), 1961. The assessee has raised the following grounds of Appeal:
1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, respected CIT Exemption has erred in law in rejecting the Shree Vignahara Trilokpati jain Shw Tirth Trust - 2 -
application of registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground of Non-registration under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 2Respected CIT exemption has erred in fact and in law in rejecting the application of registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961on the ground of absence of dissolution clause in the deed 3. Respected CIT exemption has erred in fact and in law in not allowing the appellant reasonable opportunity of being heard before passing the order of rejection of application of registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act1961 4. The appellant prays to preserve his right to add, alter or withdraw any grounds of appeal till the time of final hearing
2. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is charitable trust undertaking various charitable activities. The assessee has obtained the provisional registration and Subsequently as per amendment of the provisions u/s 12AB of the Act, the assessee for the purpose of permanent registration uploaded e- application in Form 10AB dated 30.09.2022 and the same was rejected by the CIT(E) as the assessee has not complied with the requisite details. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(E),the assessee has filed appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal.
Shree Vignahara Trilokpati jain Shw Tirth Trust - 3 -
At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assesse, and the assessee has challenged that the that CIT(E) has erred in not considering the details filed in the application for registration and compliance to e-notice issued on the ITBA portal and has not provided reasonable opportunity of hearing and rejected the application. Contra, the Ld.DR supported the order of the CIT(E).
We have heard the Ld.DR submissions and perused the material available on record. The assessee has filed the application before the CIT(E) for permanent registration under section 12AA of the Act, whereas the CIT(E) in course of hearing proceedings has issued e- notice on the assessee through ITBA portal for certain clarifications and additional information to verify the genuineness of the activities of the trust. Since there was no response to the notice in spite of providing sufficient opportunities to the assessee, the CIT(E) has rejected the application. Therefore considering, the facts, submissions and the principles of natural justice shall provide one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee to substantiate the case along with evidences and information. Accordingly, set aside the impugned
Shree Vignahara Trilokpati jain Shw Tirth Trust - 4 - order and direct the CIT(E) to denovo consider the assessee trust application as per the law and we allow the grounds of appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes Order pronounced in the open court on 08.08.2023.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026