KOMAL KANODIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-42(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per Section 4(2) of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, an appeal pending before the Tribunal is deemed withdrawn upon issuance of a certificate by the designated authority. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. At the time of hearing, the assessee did not appear and instead filed an application for withdrawal of the appeal. This withdrawal was based on a settlement reached under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT is deemed withdrawn upon settlement under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the appellate order dated 20.12.2018 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 14, New Delhi being appeal no. 175/16-17/10177, New Delhi.
At the time of hearing, non-appeared for the assessee. An application has been filed, for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee, in furtherance of settlement arrived under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (The Act of 2020).
On behalf of the appellant, from Form 5 under the Act of 2020 has been placed on record.
The sub section (2) of section 4 of the Act of 2020 provides that on issuance of certificate under sub section (1) of section 5 by the designated authority the appeal pending before this tribunal shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which the said certificate is issued.
In the light of aforesaid, the appeal in hand stands dismissed.
However, subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of The Act of 2020, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application, appropriately as per law.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026