M/S. LUPIN ENTERPRISE,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), VADODARA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 382/AHD/2020Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 September 2021AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek restoration if the assessee fails to avail the VSV scheme benefits.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal as they no longer wished to pursue it.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED

For Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Sr. DR
Hearing: 28/09/2021

आदेश/O R D E R

PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:

1.

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 12.03.2019 arising in the penalty order dated 28.03.2019 passed by the JCIT(OSD), Central Circle-1, Baroda under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2013-14.

2.

When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.

3.

The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.

4.

In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.

5.

In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 28/09/2021

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →