MILESTONE TRADELINKS PVT. LTD., ( IN THE MATTER OF ANAND TRADE MOVERS (GUJARAT ) PVT. LTD.,),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the assessee's decision to avail the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the scheme benefits could not be availed for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 26.05.2015 arising in the assessment order dated 13.03.2013 passed by the ITO, Ward-1(2), Ahmedabad under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2010-11.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 - requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.
The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 22/09/2021
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 22/09/2021 TRUE COPY TANMAY आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद । 1.Da te o f d ic ta t io n o n 2 1.0 9.20 21 As pe r V SV A Fo r mat 2.Da te o n w hic h t he t yped d ra ft is p lace d be fo r e t he D ic tat in g M e mb er 21. 09. 20 21 3.Da te o n w hic h t he a pp r o ve d d r a ft co mes to t he S r.P. S. /P. S. . 09.2 02 1 4.Da te o n w hic h t he fa ir o rde r is p lac ed be fo re t he D ic ta t ing M e mb er fo r pr o no unce me nt .09. 20 21 5.Da te o n w hic h t he fa ir o rde r c o mes bac k t o t he Sr. P. S./ P. S 22 .0 9.2 02 1 6.Da te o n w hic h t he fi le goes to t he Be nc h C le rk 2 2 .09. 20 21 7.Da te o n w hic h t he fi le goes to t he Hea d C le r k… … ……. 8.The dat e o n w hic h t he fi le goe s to t he Asst t. Re gis tr ar fo r s ig nat ur e o n t he or de r… … …… … …… … 9.Da te o f D espa tc h o f t he O r de r …… …
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026