THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SARAL REALITY, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019, which enhanced the monetary limit for Revenue appeals. The appeal was dismissed based on low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s deletion of a disallowance of parking deposit. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable in light of the revised monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु� ( ) / The CIT(A)- अपील 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध , /DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad, अिधकरण अपीलीय आयकर 6. गाड� फाईल /Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, TRUE COPY
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026