SHRI NEERAJ GUPTA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL, GURGAON
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer's fresh order resulted in no addition to the assessee's income. Therefore, the assessee's appeal became infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed a fresh order giving effect to the PCIT's order, assessing income at the returned income without any additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee has become infructuous due to a subsequent order passed by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘B, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIIVASTAVA & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV
Per Vikram Singh Yadav, Accountant Member:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) [in short the ‘Ld. Pr.CIT)’], Gurgaon, passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 23.03.2021 pertaining to assessment year 2015-16.
None has appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an application has been filed with the Registry on 23.11.2021 wherein the assessee has submitted that pursuant to the order passed by the Ld. Pr.CIT (Central) u/s 263 of the Act, the AO has since passed the fresh order u/s 147 read with section 263 of the Act dated 18.08.2021 giving effect to the order of Ld. Pr.CIT wherein the income has been assessed at returned income and no addition has been made to the income in the hands of the assessee. It was accordingly submitted that the present appeal filed by the assessee has become infructuous and he may be allowed to withdraw the same.
The Ld. DR is heard, who has not raised any objection to the said prayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
After perusing the material on record and taking into consideration the prayer submitted by the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 08.12.2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026