TANMAN INVESTMENT SERVICE PVT.LTD.,JABALPUR vs. PR.CIT-1, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The assessee was agreeable to the adjustments made in the assessment and did not wish to continue litigation.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal as an assessment order pursuant to the section 263 order had been passed, and the assessee accepted the adjustments.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn based on their acceptance of the assessment order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI SANJAY ARORA, HON’BLE & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, HONBLE
Per Sanjay Arora, AM
This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’, hereinafter) in the assessee’s case for the Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17, dated 17/03/2021.
At the outset, it was observed by the Bench that the assessee has, through his counsel, made a written request for permission to withdraw the appeal. The order pursuant to the sec. 263 order, it is stated, has since been passed. The assessee is agreeable to the adjustments made in assessment, and does not wish to litigate the same. The ld. CIT-DR fairly did not object to the said request by the assessee. 1 | P a g e
(A.Y. 2016-17) Tanam Investment Service Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pr.CIT
Under the circumstances, we accordingly have no hesitation in, accepting the assessee’s plea, direct the withdrawal of its’ appeal. We decide accordingly.
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced in open Court on May 12, 2022 Sd/- Sd/- (Manomohan Das) (Sanjay Arora) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 12/05/2022 vr/- Copy to:
1. 1. The Appellant: Tanam Investment Service Pvt. Ltd., Simplex Estate, Nagpur Road, Madan Mahal, Jabalpur.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026